Went to IMDB to check out something about the Henry V I’d just watched. (And yes, Kenneth Branagh did do the screenplay, as well as starring and directing.) Appalled by the poster, which makes it look like one of those cacky ‘The Knight of Doom’ type movies Hollywood used to churn out in the days of Cinemascope:
Rather than probably the best Shakespeare ever committed to celluloid. I think my version (knocked up with a John Bull printing set and 23 minutes), though a tad rough ‘n ready, does a far better job:
I’m sure I can’t be the only person left enervated rather than inspired by the recent trend for companies to declare their ‘passion’ for whatever it is they happen to do. Have to admit I’d view anyone with a passion for, say, logistics, as a chap probably best avoided.
Discussions thereabouts led a friend to pass on a clip once seen but long since forgotten; a perfect illustration of how in the business of communication, passion needn’t necessarily be one’s ideal ally…
Re-reading Life of Pi, I came across a brief passage that brought to mind a slight difference of opinion earlier in the day over tone of voice on a current project.
My client, I think, felt I’d erred too far from simple & straightforward toward a brand-inappropriate highbrow. I needed to ‘get closer’, to engage. The discssion continues, but in the meantime, what a cracking bit of writing!
As part of feedback on a job last week, my client said he felt his client would probably prefer to focus on their positives rather than on peers’ supposed shortcomings – a more elevated positioning, you might call it. I said it brought to mind a quote from David Ogilvy which I recalled from back in the day. I later managed to track it down – when it proved to be not David Ogilvy, but a colleague of his, quoted in his Ogilvy on Advertising:
Seems to me that contains as good a description of a copywriter’s role as I’ve ever seen: say the things that matter, clearly, honestly and informatively.