Tag Archives: Tolstoy

Your health!

While reading group’s on hold, I’ve been reading a few books too long to get on the list – Anna Karenina currently. Never having read Tolstoy, I can immediately see why he’s so revered. Wonderful writing. He’s even given me a new word I hadn’t come across:  arbeitskur.

From one brother to another, after the latter returns from a day labouring in the field with the peasants. But what does it actually mean?

In other words, the idea that there is some health/therapeutic benefit to be had from a programme of honest physical toil. Which strikes me as eminently plausible.

Long as it’s clear

How long can a sentence be? The Gunning Fog Index gives this bit of Tolstoy…

…a rating of 17.73 – the number representing the number of years’ education a person would typically need to understand a given piece of text – yet in truth, this would be perfectly clear for anyone with even a basic grasp of written English. Showing yet again, if there was ever any doubt, that if the writing’s good enough, length really isn’t an issue.

Ooh la la la difference

When you read War & Peace, you’re reading War & Peace, right? Well der. Except, you’re not, quite. What you’re reading is someone’s *take* on Tolstoy’s famous novel, not ‘the thing itself’ – not unless you’re reading it in Russian.

A fellow book clubber was telling us last night about an event she’d been to, in which two translators, modded by a third, were discussing the challenges of their trade. They took for an example, Camus’s L’Etranger. French > English, pretty straightforward, no?

Well, no. The problems begin before even p1. What do you call it? The Stranger? That’s not quite right. The Outsider? That’s not quite right either. But you have to go for one or other of those options; most plump for the latter, though it’s ‘not quite right’. And it’s been widely published as The Stranger too.

And that’s just the damn title!

Ok, moving on, sentence one: “Aujourd’hui, Maman est morte.”

Well? Do you start your translation with ‘Today’? English sentences seldom start with that word. Consequently, it sounds kind of arch, consciously ‘literary’, which is almost diametrically opposed to the deliberate banality of the original. Put that to one side, while we consider ‘Maman’? Do you go for ‘Mother’ (surely more stiff and formal than the feel of the original)? Or ‘Mum’ (surely if anything even more grotesquely wrong, for quite the opposite reason).

Still, once you’ve decided, that’s the title and two words safely banked. Only 100-odd pages to go…